Down through the ages the church on earth has often been assailed from without, but generally from within. Jesus predicted false teachers, and the apostles soon discovered the reality of His words. Early attacks revolved around questions of salvation via faith in Christ’s work on the cross alone; or should it be coupled somehow with keeping the Hebrew legal code, the Law? We easily gravitate toward polarities; on one hand we would like to do something in order to impress God with our goodness, (salvation via good works); or on the other extreme, we simply shrug off our sinfulness and need of a Savior, (I’m OK, you’re OK, we’re all OK.)
Paul’s opening in Galatians 1 is telling: “I marvel that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you by the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—which is really no gospel at all.” The test of the gospel message is Scripture itself. If the proclamation excludes or downplays God’s grace alone, His calling us to faith alone, in Jesus Christ alone; if it denies the reality o
f our sin, or negates Christ’s atonement on the cross on our behalf, it is “another” gospel.
Today, we seem to have gravitated to a “new” gospel of acceptance, instead of the “old” gospel of divine redemption. In preparing for this Sunday’s sermon, I ran across a relevant article which fully delves into these issues. http://wordalone.org/docs/wa-grorud08.shtml Check it out. What do you think; have we left the “old” gospel for another?

